INFLUENCE OF ORTHOGRAPHY IN TEACHING ENGLISH AND SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION

Authors

  • Rasulov Zubaydullo Izomovich
  • Ubaydullayeva Dilafruz Fazliddinovna

Keywords:

Orthography, phonological system, inference, L2 acquisition, queer language

Abstract

The English language has to turn out to be unavoidable being a global language inside the present generation. Whether or not it is an area of enterprise, technology, or education, its importance can’t be denied. Thus, the majority of the sector is mastering and talking English as a result of its dire need. Unluckily, despite staining thru unique reforms, the orthography of the English language did not emerge as learners’ pleasant as it appears to be a queer language for the beginners. The present study describes the methods of how English orthography becomes an obstacle for EFL rookies. It elucidates how inexperienced persons in trendy and Uzbek beginners of English language mainly, are inspired through its deep orthography. The article critiques the thrilling records of English orthography. Moreover, it reveals the phonological courting between Uzbek and English Consonants that reasons inferences based on grapheme to phoneme conversion. The look at highlights troubles posed by way of English vowels resulting in incorrect assumptions with the aid of L2 newcomers from English orthography. It sums up showing the importance of phonological awareness of English spellings to keep away from incorrect L2 phonology.

References

Blevins, W. (1997). Phonemic awareness activities for early reading success. New York, NY: Scholastic.

Bassetti, B. (2006). Orthographic input and phonological representations in learners of Chinese as a foreign language. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 95-114(20). http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/wll.9.1.07bas

Carney, E., (1994). A Survey of English spelling. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203199916

Conrad, N. J. (2008). From reading to spelling and spelling to reading: Transfer goes both ways. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 869-878.

Coulmas, F. (1999). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631214816.1999.x

Perfetti, C. A. (1997). The psycholinguistics of spelling and reading. In C. A. Perfetti, L. Reubin, & M. Karol (Ed.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 21-38). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Seymour, Philip H. K., Aro, Mikko, & Erskine, Jane M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143-174(32). http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000712603321661859

Treiman, R. (2006). Knowledge about letters as a foundation for reading and spelling. In R. M. Joshi, & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 581-599). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ubaydullayeva, D., & Rasulov, Z. (2021, April). Dealing with phonetic units in teaching pronunciation. In Конференции. https://doi.org/10.47100/conferences.v1i1.1085

Izomovich, R. Z., & Fazliddinovna, U. D. (2021). The Problems of Second Language Acquisition and Writing in Teaching English Language. "ONLINE - CONFERENCES&Quot; PLATFORM, 229–233. Retrieved from http://papers.online-conferences.com/index.php/titfl/article/view/623

Izomovich, R. Z., & Fazliddinovna, U. D. (2022). Implications from syntax for teaching a second language. Integration of Pragmalinguistics, Functional Translation Studies and Language Teaching Processes, 320-323.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-27